The editors accept manuscripts for
consideration, drawn up in accordance with the rules,
placed on the official website of the journal «Journal
of Anatomy and Histopathology» (http://www.janhist.ru/authors1-eng.files/author-guidelines.pdf).
All scientific articles,
submitted to the editorial board, are subject to mandatory
The members of Editorial Staff and Editorial
Boars - specialists in the field of science, relevant topics of
the manuscript, are conducted to the review. Co-authors
of the article as well as collaborators of
the units, where the study was carried out can not be reviewers.
procedure for review of manuscripts held in confidence.
Information about the reviewer of
manuscripts is not reported
review should include a qualified analysis of the article,
its objective assessment and based
reviewer is necessary to address the following questions:
of the article for topics and journal's profile.
with the article title and its contents.
of article structure the statutory
requirements (main sections of the article; the title of
the article in Russian and English languages,
information about the authors);
characteristics and assessment of the content of the article (relevance
and novelty of the research, scientific and methodological level,
the accuracy and validity of the conclusions, scientific and
concretization of the positive aspects as
well as drawbacks of the
article, recommendations to authors
for making corrections and additions to the article;
to make a recommendation on
appropriateness of publishing the manuscript,
necessity of its processing or rejection;
the case of negative review arguments should
be provided for rejection of the manuscript.
surname, name and patronymic,
degree, academic status, place of work,
current position, contact details (postal address, e-mail, phone)
of the reviewer,
date of drawing up reviews must be specified.
Reviewer must submit
a review of the manuscript (in electronic and printed
form) for Editorial
Staff not later than in 1 month from the date of its receipt.
In case of positive reviews,
but with any comments, åå the content
of the review is sent to the author to remove comments.
sent to the authors for processing, should be
returned in the revised form (2
copies) together with its original version as soon as possible
with the corresponding letter, containing answers to all the
comments, explains all the changes
made in the article.
article, delayed for more than 3 months or or
requiring elaboration, is regarded as a new submission.
the article, revised, on
comments from reviewer, the manuscript is sent for retrial to
the same reviewer.
of disagreement with the opinion of the reviewer the author has
the right to give a reasoned response to the
editors. The article can be directed to re-review
to the same or another reviewer, or
for discussion to
the editorial staff for the final
In the presence
of arguments, indicating the unreasonableness
of manuscript publication,
the Editorial Staff decides to reject the
article and sends
to the author a reasoned refusal in the publication.
The term of consideration of
manuscripts is not more than 3 months from the date of their
receipt to the Editor.
of reviews are stored in the
Editors for 5 years from the date of publication
available on request in accordance with the current legislation
of the Russian Federation.